Accelerating Nigeria towards malaria elimination requires moving away from business as usual: Insights from a political economy analysis

Published:

Resources: Journal article

Authors: Elisabeth G Chestnutt, Stefanie Meredith, Babatunde Ipaye, Dawit Getachew, James K Tibenderana, Ebere Anyachukwu, Timothy Obot, Kolawole Maxwell

By applying political economy analysis to the malaria programme in Nigeria, we have been able to gain a deeper understanding of the contextual factors that are holding back progress towards malaria elimination.

Background
Despite global efforts to eliminate malaria, progress in Nigeria has been slow. Political economy analysis (PEA) is increasingly being used to identify how political economy influences effective programme implementation. Here we apply PEA to the malaria programme in Nigeria to understand the contextual factors that have hindered progress.

Methods
A desk review and stakeholder mapping were carried out to identify the relevant actors in the malaria sector. Semi-structured, open-ended interviews were conducted with key influencers and high-level managers. Data were analysed and grouped thematically into factors affecting resource allocation and factors affecting the use of allocated resources.

Results
Factors affecting resource allocation included malaria receiving limited attention and resources due to low prioritisation by federal, state and local governments; weak advocacy from citizens, which means malaria elimination is not an electable issue for politicians; and no direct communication channels between the malaria programme and key decision-makers. Factors affecting the use of allocated resources included poor coordination between multiple partners working on malaria.

Conclusions
Achieving meaningful progress in malaria elimination in Nigeria requires predictable financing from sustained political will. Demand from citizens is essential to encourage political prioritisation. Programmes and partners must also be better coordinated to maximise impact with limited resources. Establishing high-level malaria advocacy groups and integrating malaria priorities into the national development plan would support these efforts.

Citation: International Health, 2025; ihaf113.

Share this page

Tagged under:

THIS IS A DEMO