Thank you for downloading this publication. Please let us know why you chose this publication:
Why are you interested in this publication?
What organisation do you represent?
You will only need to complete this form once per browser/device
How do you prefer to read or receive publications?

We may contact you for feedback on the publication you have downloaded. If you do not want to be contacted, please leave the email field blank. Your information will never be shared with any third party.

Donate Visit Malaria Consortium U.S.
  • Visit Malaria Consortium U.S.
  • What we do
    • Diseases
    • Policy development and advocacy
    • Research
    • Learning
  • Our expertise
  • Where We Work
    • Africa
    • Burkina Faso
    • Chad
    • Ethiopia
    • Mozambique
    • Nigeria
    • South Sudan
    • Uganda
    • Asia
    • Cambodia
    • Myanmar
    • Thailand
  • Projects
    • Project database
    • Featured projects
    • Past projects
  • Publications
  • Media centre
    • Newsletters
    • News
    • Blog
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • Press and media
    • Photo stories
    • Voices of experience
  • About us
    • Who we are
    • Governance
    • Aid transparency
    • Dr Sylvia Meek
    • Annual reviews
    • Policies and procedures
    • Careers
    • Tenders
    • Contact us
    • Malaria Consortium U.S.
  • Support us
  • Home
  • »
  • Resources
  • »
  • Publications
  • »
  • Supervising community health workers in low-income countries: A review of impact and implementation issues

Share this page

Resources

Latest

Publications

Publication Date:
26/06/2014

Type:
Journal article
Publication

Supervising community health workers in low-income countries: A review of impact and implementation issues
Author(s): Zelee Hill, Mari Dumbaugh, Lorna Benton, Karin Källander, Daniel Strachan, Augustinus ten Asbroek, James Tibenderana, Betty Kirkwood, and Sylvia Meek

Publication Date:
26/06/2014
Type:
Journal article

Background

Community health workers (CHWs) are an increasingly important component of health systems and programs. Despite the recognized role of supervision in ensuring CHWs are effective, supervision is often weak and under-supported. Little is known about what constitutes adequate supervision and how different supervision strategies influence performance, motivation, and retention.

Objective

To determine the impact of supervision strategies used in low- and middle-income countries and discuss implementation and feasibility issues with a focus on CHWs.

Design

A search of peer-reviewed, English language articles evaluating health provider supervision strategies was conducted through November 2013. Included articles evaluated the impact of supervision in low- or middle-income countries using a controlled, pre-/post- or observational design. Implementation and feasibility literature included both peer-reviewed and gray literature.

Results

A total of 22 impact papers were identified. Papers were from a range of low- and middle-income countries addressing the supervision of a variety of health care providers. We classified interventions as testing supervision frequency, the supportive/facilitative supervision package, supervision mode (peer, group, and community), tools (self-assessment and checklists), focus (quality assurance/problem solving), and training. Outcomes included coverage, performance, and perception of quality but were not uniform across studies. Evidence suggests that improving supervision quality has a greater impact than increasing frequency of supervision alone. Supportive supervision packages, community monitoring, and quality improvement/problem-solving approaches show the most promise; however, evaluation of all strategies was weak.

Conclusion

Few supervision strategies have been rigorously tested and data on CHW supervision is particularly sparse. This review highlights the diversity of supervision approaches that policy makers have to choose from and, while choices should be context specific, our findings suggest that high-quality supervision that focuses on supportive approaches, community monitoring, and/or quality assurance/problem solving may be most effective.

Click here to download

Keywords: Capacity development | Case management | Diagnosis | iCCM | Treatment | SDG3

 

 

« Back to Publications

Sign up for our publications newsletter here:

Sign up for our newsletters here:

  • Visit Malaria Consortium U.S.
  • What we do
    • Diseases
    • Policy development and advocacy
    • Research
    • Learning
  • Our expertise
  • Where We Work
    • Africa
    • Burkina Faso
    • Chad
    • Ethiopia
    • Mozambique
    • Nigeria
    • South Sudan
    • Uganda
    • Asia
    • Cambodia
    • Myanmar
    • Thailand
  • Projects
    • Project database
    • Featured projects
    • Past projects
  • Publications
  • Media centre
    • Newsletters
    • News
    • Blog
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • Press and media
    • Photo stories
    • Voices of experience
  • About us
    • Who we are
    • Governance
    • Aid transparency
    • Dr Sylvia Meek
    • Annual reviews
    • Policies and procedures
    • Careers
    • Tenders
    • Contact us
    • Malaria Consortium U.S.
  • Support us

Language Options: English | Français

© 2022 Malaria Consortium | Charity No. 1099776 | Company No. 4785712 | Privacy notice | Modern Slavery Statement | United Nations Global Compact