Thank you for downloading this publication. Please let us know why you chose this publication:
Why are you interested in this publication?
What organisation do you represent?
You will only need to complete this form once per browser/device
How do you prefer to read or receive publications?

We may contact you for feedback on the publication you have downloaded. If you do not want to be contacted, please leave the email field blank. Your information will never be shared with any third party.

Malaria Consortium US Donate
  • About us
    • Who we are
    • Our Strategy
    • Governance
    • Aid transparency
  • Projects
  • Where We Work
  • What we do
    • Diseases
    • Our responses
    • Burden reduction to elimination
    • Data-informed decision-making & digital approaches
    • Health sector resilience
    • Research & policy change
    • Networks & partnerships
  • News & Resources
    • News
    • Blog
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • Photo stories
  • Publications
    • Interactive publications
  • Support us
  • Contact Us
    • Newsletter
  • Work with us
    • Tenders
  • Home
  • »
  • Publications
  • »
  • Effectiveness of seasonal malaria chemoprevention at scale in west and central Africa: An observational study

Share this page

Resources

Latest

Publications

Publication Date:
05/12/2020

Type:
Journal article
Publication

Effectiveness of seasonal malaria chemoprevention at scale in west and central Africa: An observational study

Publication Date:
05/12/2020
Type:
Journal article
Background 
 
Seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC) aims to prevent malaria in children during the high malaria transmission season. The Achieving Catalytic Expansion of SMC in the Sahel (ACCESS-SMC) project sought to remove barriers to the scale-up of SMC in seven countries in 2015 and 2016. We evaluated the project, including coverage, effectiveness of the intervention, safety, feasibility, drug resistance, and cost-effectiveness.
 
Methods
 
For this observational study, we collected data on the delivery, effectiveness, safety, influence on drug resistance, costs of delivery, impact on malaria incidence and mortality, and cost-effectiveness of SMC, during its administration for 4 months each year (2015 and 2016) to children younger than five years, in Burkina Faso, Chad, The Gambia, Guinea, Mali, Niger, and Nigeria. SMC was administered monthly by community health workers who visited door-to-door. Drug administration was monitored via tally sheets and via household cluster-sample coverage surveys. Pharmacovigilance was based on targeted spontaneous reporting and monitoring systems were strengthened. Molecular markers of resistance to sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine and amodiaquine in the general population before and two years after SMC introduction was assessed from community surveys. Effectiveness of monthly SMC treatments was measured in case-control studies that compared receipt of SMC between patients with confirmed malaria and neighbourhood-matched community controls eligible to receive SMC. Impact on incidence and mortality was assessed from confirmed outpatient cases, hospital admissions, and deaths associated with malaria, as reported in national health management information systems in Burkina Faso and The Gambia, and from data from selected outpatient facilities (all countries). Provider costs of SMC were estimated from financial costs, costs of health-care staff time, and volunteer opportunity costs, and cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated as the total cost of SMC in each country divided by the predicted number of cases averted.
 
Findings
 
12 467 933 monthly SMC treatments were administered in 2015 to a target population of 3,650455 children, and 25,117480 were administered in 2016 to a target population of 7 551 491. In 2015, among eligible children, mean coverage per month was 76·4 percent (95 percent CI 74·0–78·8), and 54·5 percent children (95 percent CI 50·4–58·7) received all four treatments. Similar coverage was achieved in 2016 (74·8 percent [72·2–77·3] treated per month and 53·0 percent [48·5–57·4] treated four times). In 779 individual case safety reports over 2015–16, 36 serious adverse drug reactions were reported (one child with rash, two with fever, 31 with gastrointestinal disorders, one with extrapyramidal syndrome, and one with Quincke's oedema). No cases of severe skin reactions (Stevens-Johnson or Lyell syndrome) were reported. SMC treatment was associated with a protective effectiveness of 88·2 percent (95 percent CI 78·7–93·4) over 28 days in case-control studies (2,185 cases of confirmed malaria and 4,370 controls). In Burkina Faso and The Gambia, implementation of SMC was associated with reductions in the number of malaria deaths in hospital during the high transmission period, of 42·4 percent (95 percent CI 5·9 to 64·7) in Burkina Faso and 56·6 percent (28·9 to 73·5) in The Gambia. Over 2015–16, the estimated reduction in confirmed malaria cases at outpatient clinics during the high transmission period in the seven countries ranged from 25·5 percent (95 percent CI 6·1 to 40·9) in Nigeria to 55·2 percent (42·0 to 65·3) in The Gambia. Molecular markers of resistance occurred at low frequencies. In individuals aged 10–30 years without SMC, the combined mutations associated with resistance to amodiaquine (pfcrt CVIET haplotype and pfmdr1 mutations [86Tyr and 184Tyr]) had a prevalence of 0·7 percent (95 percent CI 0·4–1·2) in 2016 and 0·4 percent (0·1–0·8) in 2018 (prevalence ratio 0·5 [95 percent CI 0·2–1·2]), and the quintuple mutation associated with resistance to sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine (triple mutation in pfdhfr and pfdhps mutations [437Gly and 540Glu]) had a prevalence of 0·2 percent (0·1–0·5) in 2016 and 1·0 percent (0·6–1·6) in 2018 (prevalence ratio 4·8 [1·7–13·7]). The weighted average economic cost of administering four monthly SMC treatments was US$3·63 per child.
 
Interpretation
 
SMC at scale was effective in preventing morbidity and mortality from malaria. Serious adverse reactions were rarely reported. Coverage varied, with some areas consistently achieving high levels via door-to-door campaigns. Markers of resistance to sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine and amodiaquine remained uncommon, but with some selection for resistance to sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine, and the situation needs to be carefully monitored. These findings should support efforts to ensure high levels of SMC coverage in west and central Africa.
 
Published in The Lancet

Click here to download

Country: Burkina Faso | Chad | Guinea | Mali | Niger | Nigeria | The Gambia

Keywords: Community delivery | Costing and economic impact evaluation | Research | Malaria | Maternal, neonatal and child health | Seasonal malaria chemoprevention | SDG3

 

 

« Back to Publications

Sign up for our newsletter here:

Follow us on our social channels
  • Jobs
  • Contact us
  • Annual reviews
  • Support us
  • About us
  • Sitemap
  • Policies
  • Modern Slavery Statement
Fundraising Regulator logo
© 2023 Malaria Consortium | Charity No. 1099776 | Company No. 4785712